A SusaHumor-Style Meet and Greet with S*san

First of all, the SusaHumor gang (SHG) wouldn’t go because they hate meet and greets.  S*san would be the only one attending because the SHG would be too polite to ever intrude upon S*san’s precious time.  And since none of them have rich husbands, they also wouldn’t be able to afford to attend.  However, if they did decide to attend (and we all know they would because they are all dying to meet her) it would be quite boring because…

They would make her sit still at a table, they wouldn't let her say anything funny because that would mean she felt as though she had to entertain, they wouldn't ask her to autograph anything, they wouldn't give her any gifts because they wouldn't want to take up any room in her home and they also think she doesn't need anything since she's rich, and they wouldn’t touch her because it would be disrespectful so no hugs would be allowed. 

They might as well just have a meet and greet with flat S*san.  Oh no, can't do that, flat S*san is an embarrassment, even though S*san likes her. 

Well, what would they talk about?  They certainly wouldn’t talk about religion or prayer groups, even though religion is important to S*san.  If S*san brings up her faith, they would just sit there politely with smiles on their faces and say nothing.  Perhaps they could talk about all the people they detest on S*FII and how they all got banned due to lack of “freedom of speech” (without responsibility).  S*san would love the way they ridicule members of S*FII since she is such an advocate for bullies.  (Cath*lics are big advocates for bullies.)  Maybe she would have a few of her favorites to gripe about.  They could talk about her joining their forum and posting about these people on the guest forum for everyone to see.  They wouldn’t want to give her the user name “Lirpa Loof,” though.  That would be disrespectful, even though S*san thinks it’s funny.  I wonder what respectful name they would come up with, since they are such advocates of respect.  They could then talk about the declining number of members on S*FII and what they could do to disrupt things on S*FII and recruit more members to their forum.  S*san would love to get in on the action.  Perhaps they could talk S*san into giving up her singing career just to join them in their pursuits!   After all, it’s a full time job!

Lastly, they would need to make a poster and a video to commemorate their little gathering.  Who would make their poster?  Oh, “the boss” makes great posters.  Someone would then need to make a video.  It could be called the “anti-meet and greet, anti-flat S*san, anti-hug, anti-gift, anti-autograph SusaHumor wily-gate.”  

Oh, what fun they would have!  

Hypocrisy

Posted on the SusaHumor Guest Forum by nevermore a.k.a. Di*neB on August 25, 2011:

“She [wfg] has attended EVERY TIME the elitists met with Susan, and she was in her house with Pickled Stink.  And she’s a board member, isn’t she?”

How many people know that Di*neB spent six weeks in Blackburn in the summer of 2010 and that she spent time inside and outside S*san's house?  And this was her second stay in Blackburn.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Di*neB a.k.a. nevermore has confirmed that she was in Blackburn for nine weeks, not six weeks [on her second trip to BB] as posted above, and that she was at Sus*n’s house “a few times.”  She says on her first visit she played her ukulele and sang and that Sus*n got up and danced.  On another occasion, they ate Cadbury chocolate fingers and drank tea together.  It’s all right for her, but it’s not all right for wfg or others?  Does this not constitute hypocrisy? 

If spending nine weeks in Blackburn and visiting Sus*n at her house “a few times” is all right for Di*neB, then why is it not all right for others to visit Sus*n on other occasions, whether at a meet and greet or at her house?  Why are others called names and labeled part of an “elitist” group when they visit Sus*n?  No one has been prevented from participating in the meet and greets in Scotland.  Everyone is welcome to attend. 

Your lovely “boss” on the SH forum considers Blackburn sacred ground that should not be tread upon by fans.  Does this exclude members of his forum?  And what about a nine-week stay in BB?  Would it be considered acceptable behavior if anyone else from S*FII had done this?

What is the Crime?

By stating publicly that felonies were committed by members of the S*FII staff, the accusers make it appear as if they already have sufficient proof.  If that's the case, why not press charges now?  Why continue with an investigation when they already have the proof that they need?

If they don't have absolute proof, why are they stating publicly that felonies were committed?  What do they hope to gain by making accusations that they can't or won't back up?  Exactly what felonies have been committed?  No specific felonies or crimes of any sort have been clearly outlined anywhere.

It has become quite obvious that they have no proof of anything and their sole objective is to continue trying to divide the membership of S*FII and bring it down.  When people desperately trying to prove a point have no proof of their claims, their claims tend to become louder and more exaggerated in a desperate attempt to stir up the followers (a.k.a. sheeples), cement them to the cause, and retain their power while having no intention of following through on the claims.

Their followers, unable to logically reason for themselves and unwilling to question those whom they blindly follow, continue to believe everything they are told and never question what crimes have been committed or why legal action hasn't already been taken.  How long are they willing to wait before they realize they have been taken for a ride?

What are some of these dual members really thinking?

Posted by gday on SusaHumor:

"After reading through most of this thread, I guess I'll throw in my 2 cents worth. I am not keen on this musical with E***** S**** playing S**** B****. I have, like many of you, followed S****'s life and career ever since her audition on BGT. Her voice is wonderful, magical, emotional, and just down right beautiful. Why would I want to pay money to see someone else pretend to be S**** B****? Will E***** sing like S****? Will she lip-synch S****'s songs? I know about as much of S****'s life story as most of you. I've read her book. I have listened over and over to both of her albums. I've spent the past 2 years drawing and painting many portraits of S****. I know her facial expressions very clearly. It's even been a little pat on my back that S**** has been presented with two of my original works- a graphite drawing of her with Cardin*l O'B****, and a painting of her greeting the P*pe.

So, I want the real thing. I want to see S**** perform again. I want to hear more of her fabulous voice, whether it's on stage or on another album. And I don't want to be involved with a bunch of frantic, fanatic, pollyanna old ladies to do so. I have no interest in seeing this musical. I want the real thing.

Am with you on that Teri, and even so, am not interested in seeing a pretend to be S****, chorus or no chorus."

Behind the Scenes

Post by xeno on SusaHumor from April, 2011:

I don't think I've been nearly harsh enough.  There was an opportunity to set things right, to salvage that site and actually fulfill the promise of fan ownership, back in July. That opportunity was not merely lost, it was thrown away. We know who did the throwing.

Chris insisted that she must keep her bargain, but said that she would be able to somehow oust Pickle and her wretched gang at a later date. I heard that repeatedly during and after the July food fight. Think about that: SBFII was turned over to people whom Chris and dyebat knew were corrupt, but the two of them said that they never meant that to be a permanent state of affairs. Well, here we are, nine months down the line, and Pickle is still large and in charge over there. Nothing has been revealed in the blogs that would allow anyone to remove the current owners of that site. To me this shows that there was a massive fuck-up on somebody's part. There were only two somebodies making the major decisions when the site was handed over. Do the math. Your conclusion ought to be as harsh as mine, even if you use your fingers and toes to add things up.